First, since the age constraint protects them, students commit illegal acts without the fear of receiving harsh punishments. For example, one of my roommates who is sharing room 705 with me told me that in her school, it is common to see students smoking and drinking alcohol. I assume that this situation was possible since young girls and bots are surely protected by the age constraint for imprisonment. Also, according to lawyershop.com, some crimes do not even get reported if people are not arrested. http://www.lawyershop.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/juvenile-law/crimes
This reduces the pressure of law to minimum. These days, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act targets juvenile crimes by assisting state and local governments in providing preventative services to high-risk youths. Juvenile courts have special rules and procedures that are unique to the juvenile law system. A majority of youth cases are resolved informally and without a trial. This is undermining the fear of imprisonment.
Second, the acceptance of age restriction is reducing the fear of the law. To be specific, the punishment of juvenile offenders also differs significantly from the punishment of adult criminals. Because the youth justice system seeks to rehabilitate youth delinquents, adolescence courts may impose a variety of flexible sentences. Punishments include placement in a rehabilitation program, payment of restitution to victims, imposition of court-determined curfews, mandatory school attendance, or placement in an adolescence detention facility. The law should be conversed to allow students about fourteen to be sentenced to go to prison.
Of course, some may say that teenagers are open to making mistakes, so it is so harsh to devastate their dreams and future. Nevertheless, before I explain, let me state a point. According to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), three major categories of youth crimes are violent crimes, crimes against property, and drug-related crimes. Fortunately, crimes against property and drug related crimes have reduced greatly during recent years. Obviously violent crimes are the most common one. Then, do you think these students will be capable of realizing what is wrong before the government shows them? It is crucial to encourage students for a brighter future for them, but we need to point what's right and wrong as well.
For these reasons, I strongly claim that we need to lower age limit from 18 to 14. First, teenagers are not fearing illegal deeds. Second, we can create a better image for law. For our children and an enlightened future, we need to realize that lowering age constraint is essential.